The Easter Error

Before I begin this discourse, it is necessary to place before the reader three propositions, items I deem necessary, if not to the logic, at least to the spirit in which the arguments are performed. First, I am not without the prescience that that which I herein note will not change the minds and hearts of them that cling to one position or another, that it will neither empty a pew, nor cause one to be filled. Yet, in the dissemination of any knowledge it is always the hope that somewhere a seed will fall upon fertile ground and begin to take root, one day, perhaps, to flower and bear fruit. We live by adapting, and we adapt by having the faith we can, the envisioning hope that the vision ahead is reachable—in some manner. Continue reading

Posted in on Denial, Doubt, and Divinity | Comments Off on The Easter Error

“Fear not!”

“The angel of the Lord stood before them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them. They were terrified. But the angel said to them: “Fear not!…I bring you good news and it shall be a great joy to all peoples…To you this day is born…a saviour.” (Luke 2).

Before a perceived danger, it is natural to feel fear for one’s personal safety and well-being. Fear alerts us, readies us for defence. Fear, however, like all things, can possess us. We can allow it to possess us. In this, fear turns inward upon itself. It becomes not a sentinel of danger, merely fear itself, a fearing of no-thing actual. It is fear unleashed from its protective moorings, scanning the abyss of sheer potentialities. It is here, in this inwardness, that fear reveals its roots. The soul, in its depths, “knows”[i] the boundlessness of being, the cosmic scale of possibilities, and as well, its individuated limitedness, its finitude, its mortality. Man may with trust, with a grounding self-confidence, plot in fortitude, prudence, and hope to extend himself in every direction, but never can he do so without end. Ultimately then, every fear encapsulates that one primal fear—death. The Hebrew scriptures say no man may look upon God and live. They say also the “fear” of God is the beginning of wisdom. It is sin which eyes God as a threat, that denies the trustworthiness[ii] of God, that refuses to see in him the care and love of either father or saviour. It is sin that would defend itself before God, seek to defeat, to neutralize God. But the wise man fears God not as a threat but as the unsurpassable power that defines his and every other fleeting moment. Wisdom knows the sheer power of the Font of all being is so beyond comprehension, so, before the mind and heart of man, tremendous in majesty that man must draw back in awe, quiver in astonishment. Wisdom knows words—those definiens of communicability, internal and external—fail. Here man arms himself not. He kneels. He worships. The biblical notion of the fear of God, of the immortal One, is the obverse of the fear of death for fear here bows to the infinite, accepts finitude as gift, and trusts in the giver. It humbly appreciates infinity’s dwarfing of the finite. It embraces its concrete factuality, its pointed, blunt, and ultimate ultimatum: freedom or fate, thou may seek to conquer one or the other.[iii] Thus, wisdom knows its freedom, and hopes beyond fate. Man supplicates God to save him, spare him, release him, redeem him from his fated end and from every form of death. Man prays to partake of divine boundlessness, to have of God’s aid, his grace, in the moments of challenge, and to rest in immortality. To whom else can man make such fervent prayer? If fear, however, is part of the nature of man, why does this angel in Luke’s telling tell us to fear not? Continue reading

Posted in on Etiquette for the soul, on Sacred texts | Comments Off on “Fear not!”

“Do you believe Jesus was God incarnate?”

“Do you believe Jesus was God incarnate?” That was the question recently asked. It was not the first placing of that question before me. I am inclined to think that often when it is asked, it is in the hope I will confirm the interlocutor’s faith by replying either that he was just a man, or that he was indeed God incarnate. Unfortunately, the question is too vague because the term “God” is too vague in most minds, and the idea of “incarnation” too indefinite—even in those defining propositions of the official creeds that render Jesus a mystery of faith, a perfect and unconfused unity of human and divine natures with the term “natures” itself a philosophical idea that is open to debatable definition. Continue reading

Posted in on Sacred texts | Comments Off on “Do you believe Jesus was God incarnate?”

Spirituality, Part 8: Sabbath Rest and Ceaseless Prayer

The Sabbath

For six days God created the heavens and the earth, and on the seventh he rested, so relates the sacred narrative of Genesis. Judaism encoded within this tale the basis of its division betwixt labour and leisure. The consecration of rest for man on the seventh day gradually embosomed rest for cattle, land, and crops, the hallowing of the seventh year as the time for the retirement of the bonds of servitude and debt, and the capping year of a jubilee, the seventh return of the seventh year. The sacredness, the fullness, of the seventh day was elevated into a holistic cynosure. While the ideal endured, the prophets give evidence that practice was inconsistent. In Jesus’ day, Judaism, faced with the internationalizing challenges of Roman imperialism, recoiled on many fronts into conservatism, fundamentalism, literalism. Jesus challenges the drubbing of religion into legalism; he allows his disciples to pick grain on the Sabbath, he heals the sick on the Sabbath, for the Sabbath, says he, is for man, and to invert this ideal creates servitude, not leisure. Such humanitarianism served him not well. Continue reading

Posted in on Etiquette for the soul | Comments Off on Spirituality, Part 8: Sabbath Rest and Ceaseless Prayer

Spirituality, Part 7: A Survey of Proposed Pathways

As the Bhagavad-Gita seemingly moves towards its zenith in a great battle, Arjuna’s companion and friend suspends the near cosmic momentum with a revelation. He is the Lord God Krishna. The astonished Arjuna worshipfully announces his intention to leave behind his worldly concerns and reside in contemplation of the divine. Krishna objects, and then gives a teaching on life and holiness. There are many ways to oneness, holiness, wholeness. They share a singular essence: the surrender of ego-centricity that the self become free to the divine within, allowing, thus, its power to freely flow. This involves learning not simply a mindlessness of self, but a mindfulness of the world about oneself. Anger, ignorance, and self-sanctification are the three great impediments to this state of being, this state of mind and heart, this wholistic presence with-in the world. One need not go off into solitude, for even in the devotions of the simple-most of mind and heart God is to be found. One must accept one’s position and vocation in this world, and for Arjuna, a prince, it is to lead and to care for his people wisely and well.

Christianity has, in the sundry times and places it has found itself, asked how wisely and well to focus, find, and maintain a mindlessness of self and a caring mindfulness of the world God has not only made but redeemed in his Word and continuously calls to its wholeness in his Holy Spirit. This tract is a brief consideration of the major currents evidenced in that pious pursuit. Continue reading

Posted in on Etiquette for the soul | Comments Off on Spirituality, Part 7: A Survey of Proposed Pathways

Spirituality, Part 6: The centre cannot hold: searching for the gospel truth

The fallacy of the immutable centre

“Things fall apart, the center cannot hold” wrote Yeats[i] as he portended the Western world slowly falling from faith both in itself, and its vesture of Christian cult. As with all brought face to face with the blunt factuality of our finitude—be it as individual, or some greater or lesser configuration of community—Yeats’ poem is permeated with a type of mourning, with melancholy, pessimism, resignation. It is a prescient work presaging the whereto a great cultural loss of communal vision and hope lead. It is a deathwatch for a civilization in extremis. The centre, however, never holds. The centre is an illusion, a transcendental ideal about, not immutability, but continuity. Continue reading

Posted in on Etiquette for the soul | Comments Off on Spirituality, Part 6: The centre cannot hold: searching for the gospel truth

Spirituality, Part 5: The Substitutes and the Synthesizers: Angels, Augustine, Aquinas

As in many times past, the phenomenon of angels is upon us again as common religiosity looks to the heavens for some succor the visions of God and Jesus and saints have, for sundry reasons, ceased to provide. They appear as individually pliable succendanea for the traditionally defined icons of the holy. In Christianity, angels have customarily been pictured as members of the minor clergy, as the acolytes, canters and deacons at the heavenly altar. In concert with that ministerial role, they are seen today, with the panoply of its unmet pastoral needs, as avatars of the sacred and caring, supernal medics buoying humanity to well-being of body and soul as their “fallen members”, those denizens of hell, taunt and torment “fallen humanity” to irrevocably sink to their despicable spiritual destitution, their denial, not of God, but of his loving plan to sanctify humanity and all his work. Angels, both the heavenly and hellish, present the mind potent icons for those forces into which the moral mind divides reality–good and evil. Continue reading

Posted in on Etiquette for the soul | Comments Off on Spirituality, Part 5: The Substitutes and the Synthesizers: Angels, Augustine, Aquinas